Table of Contents
Cleanovators 2023 Panel Q&A
Webinar Description
Hosted by Charles Setzer and Mai Blackwell, each of our presenters throughout Cleanovators 2023 will answer viewer questions and dive deeper into the day's presentations.
Key Takeaways
- Floors and windows are the most common residue accumulation areas.
- UV and ozone can reduce or eliminate residue but have operational limitations.
- Residue-free does not equal effective disinfection.
- Shadowing and distance limit UV performance.
- Ozone requires careful safety management.
- Residue management must be structured and proactive.
- Effective contamination control balances microbial efficacy and surface cleanliness.
- Innovation should complement—not compromise—validated cleaning programs.
Webinar Resources
Webinar Section Summaries
Non-Chemical Sanitizers (UV and Ozone) and Residue Reduction
Non-chemical sanitizers such as UV light or aqueous ozone can eliminate or reduce residue issues:
- UV light leaves no residue.
- Ozone, while technically a chemical, does not leave persistent surface residue.
Therefore, these technologies could reduce residue accumulation compared to traditional chemical disinfectants.
However, eliminating residue does not automatically equate to effective disinfection.
Practical Limitations of UV Disinfection
While UV does not leave residue, it presents significant operational challenges:
- Effectiveness depends on distance from the UV source.
- Shadowing limits microbial exposure.
- Line-of-sight is required for efficacy.
- Surfaces not directly exposed may not be disinfected.
UV cannot replace manual cleaning because it lacks mechanical removal capability and may not consistently achieve required microbial reduction across complex environments.
Ozone: Benefits and Exposure Considerations
Ozone can be an effective sanitizer when applied at proper concentrations.
Advantages of ozone:
- Minimal or no surface residue.
- Strong oxidizing properties.
Challenges of ozone:
- Occupational exposure concerns.
- Safety limitations.
- Control of concentration and contact time.
While ozone may reduce residue issues, it introduces other safety and operational considerations.
Residue Formation vs. Disinfection Effectiveness
Reducing residue is not the same as improving contamination control.
Traditional disinfectants may leave residue but provide:
- Validated microbial kill claims
- Broad-spectrum activity
- Established regulatory acceptance
Residue management should not come at the expense of effective disinfection.
Cleaning Frequency and Residue Control Strategies
Residue control depends on:
- Frequency of disinfectant application
- Surface material
- Environmental conditions
- Routine removal steps
Even facilities that rotate disinfectants or use multiple chemistries must incorporate periodic residue removal.
Non-residual technologies do not eliminate the need for surface cleaning.
Real-World Observations from Facility Assessments
Cleanrooms often contain the same residue challenges:
- Windows reveal visible residue first.
- Floors often carry the heaviest accumulation.
- Residue issues are nearly universal.
Experience across numerous facility assessments confirms that environmental residue management is commonly underprioritized.
Integrating Residue Removal into Daily Operations
Residue management should not be reactive.
Proactive residue management includes:
- Defining removal frequency
- Incorporating steps into SOPs
- Training operators
- Monitoring visually
- Aligning with contamination control strategy
Effective programs balance microbial control and surface cleanliness.
Balancing Innovation with Regulatory Expectations
While innovative technologies (UV, ozone) offer potential advantages, regulatory acceptance and proven efficacy remain essential.
Facilities must consider:
- Validation data
- Worker safety
- Regulatory expectations
- Practical limitations
New approaches may supplement but rarely replace established cleaning and disinfection practices.